In an interim application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, the High Court accepted out-of-court settlement terms. The suit was decreed according to the undertakings given by the defendant, with parties bearing their own expenses.
Suit decreed in terms of the settlement terms contained in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25
M/S KIRORIMAL KASHIRAM MARKETING AND AGENCIES PVT. LTD. Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate
versus
M/S SACHDEVA & SONS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Defendant Through: Mr. Manu Bansal, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 14.05.2015
I.A. 10185/2015 (joint application u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)
CS(OS) 1416/2007 Page 1 of 3
the plaint. Counsels for the parties state that they shall remain bound by the obligations undertaken by them and recorded in the compromise application and request that the suit be decreed in terms thereof.
CS(OS) 1416/2007 Page 2 of 3
recorded in the application, while leaving the parties to bear their own expenses.
File be consigned to the record room.
HIMA KOHLI, J
MAY 14, 2015 mk
CS(OS) 1416/2007 Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compromise settlement arrived at by the parties should be enforced by decreeing the suit on the agreed terms.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Kirorimal Kashiram Marketing And Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
M/S Sachdeva & Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Hima Kohli
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
