Raju @ Gayur v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi affirmed the conviction of the appellant for attempted rape, holding that the evidence showed determination to commit the act which was prevented by the wife's timely arrival. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merits.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed. The appellant was directed to surrender to serve the remaining sentence.
What the court decided
$
*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
RESERVED ON : OCTOBER 29, 2015 DECIDED ON : DECEMBER 10, 2015
- CRL.A. 635/2005
RAJU @ GAYUR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Brijesh Kumar Singh, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Ahlawat, APP.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.GARG, J.
- The appellant Raju @ Gayur impugns a judgment dated 08.04.2005 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.99/04 arising out of FIR No.326/04 registered at Police Station Badarpur by which he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC. By an order dated 21.04.2005, he was awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for three and half years with fine `500/-.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant's conviction for attempted rape under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC is sustainable.
Whether the trial court's findings on the possibility of attempted rape should be disturbed on appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Raju @ Gayur
- respondent
State
Coram
S.P. Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court