Kamna v. the State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged torture by husband/family and lack of FIR. Court found FIR registered post-complaint, making petition infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
$~23
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2116/2015
KAMNA
..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Reenu Panchal, Adv.
versus
THE STATE & ORS
..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 07.12.2015
The petitioner alleges torture at the hands of her parents in law and husband and others in the family. She is also aggrieved by the fact that despite her specific complaint, no FIR has been registered against the accused persons.
Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional Standing Counsel, however, submits that pursuant to the complaint lodged by the petitioner, FIR has already been lodged and a copy of the said FIR has been despatched to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamna
- respondent
THE STATE & ORS
Coram
Ashutosh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court