The petition sought compensation/pension. The Court granted liberty to withdraw the petition and approach respondents with a representation, subsequently dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw writ petition and approach respondents for compensation/pension; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.P.Singh and Mr.Rohit Sharma, Advocates Mr.S.S.Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition and approach the respondents with a representation for compensate allowance/pension.
In light of these circumstances, liberty is granted. Writ petition and the pending application are dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
OCTOBER 05, 2015 rb
Birmati
Union of India
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
