The petitioner filed an application seeking amendment of a W.P. order to correct the listing date of the order and record the presence of the learned counsel who appeared. The High Court granted the amendment as prayed.
Directed the office to amend the order date to 04.06.2016 and record the presence of the appearing counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
M.C. SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. S.N. Kaul, Advocate. versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 25.07.2016
C.M. APPL.25593/2016
The application seeks amendment of the order dated 03.11.2015. It is stated that though the hearing was concluded and the order indicated on 03.11.2015, the order was released on 04.06.2016. In the circumstances, the office is directed to amend the date of the order and record it accurately as 04.06.2016. Furthermore, the office is directed to record the presence on behalf of the Sh. Ajay Digpaul, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the Union of India. The amended certified copy shall be issued accordingly.
Order dasti.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
JULY 25, 2016 ájk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the date of the order should be amended to accurately reflect its release date.
Whether the presence of counsel who appeared should be recorded.
M.C. SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
