M.P.Singh & Anr. v. F.C.I. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners deposited cost but did not press the application; consequently, the application was dismissed as not pressed. Notices were issued for related applications CM No.9895/2016, 9897/2016 & 9898/2016.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 19704/2004
M.P.SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Dr.Surat Singh, Adv.
versus
CHAIRMAN, F.C.I. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH
O R D E R % 22.03.2016
CM No.9896/2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have deposited the cost of Rs.10,000/- imposed vide order dated 05.02.2015 on 24.02.2016 vide receipt No.2473.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.P.SINGH & ANR.
- respondent
CHAIRMAN, F.C.I. & ORS.
Coram
V.P.VAISH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court