Dismissed

Raiyaz Ali v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC8 Dec 2015W.P.(C)/11374/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment lists multiple writ petitions challenging Central Administrative Tribunal orders directing the Government to allow eligible candidates to reappear for the Civil Services Exam with a new pattern. Upon the petitioner's counsel submitting a copy of the DoPT's complying order and seeking leave to withdraw the petitions, the Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the writ petitio

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the writ petitions. All pending applications disposed of.

Raiyaz Ali Vs Union of India & Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2015)

¶1

7$~94 – 99-102

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

	Date of Judgment	: 8^thDecember, 2015
+	W.P.(C) 11371/2015, CM APPL. No. 29936/2015 VISHWANATH PRATAP SINGH CHAUHA AND O versus UOI AND ANR.	RS. ..... Petitioners ..... Respondents
$-95
+	W.P.(C) 11372/2015, CM APPL. No. 29937/2015
	SEEMA SINGH	..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA & ANR.	..... Respondents
$-96
+	W.P.(C) 11374/2015, CM APPL. No. 29939/2015 RAIYAZ ALI	..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA & ANR.	..... Respondents
$-99
+	W.P.(C) 11377/2015, CM APPL. No. 29940/2015 RUSHIKESH RAMCHANDRA DUDHAT	..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA & ANR.	..... Respondents
$-100
+	W.P.(C) 11378/2015 CM APPL. No. 29941/2015 SURESH KUMAR SHUKLA	..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA & ANR.	..... Respondents

¶4

W. P. (C) Nos. 11371/2015, 11372/2015, 11374/2015, 11377-80/2015

¶5

Page 1 of 3

¶6

$-101 + W.P.(C) 11379/2015 CM APPL. No. 29942/2015 NARENDRA PAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents $-102 + W.P.(C) 11380/2015, CM APPL. No. 29943/2015 ARVIND KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ANR. ..... Respondent

¶7

Appearance

¶8

Mr. Manish Kumar Saran and Mr. Avnish Kumar, Advocates for petitioners (Item Nos. 94 to 96, 99 and 100-102)

¶9

Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Rishi Kapoor and Mr. Srikant Misra, GP for UOI. (Item Nos. 94 to 96 and 99 to 102).

¶10

Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Ms. Kritika, Advocates for UPSC (Item No. 94 to 96 and 99 to 102)

¶11

Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates for respondent No. 1 (Item No. 94 and 102)

¶12

Mr. Sidharth Khatana, Advocate, GP for UOI (Item Nos. 94 and 102)

¶13

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

¶14

G.S.SISTANI, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Challenge in these writ petitions being W. P. (C) Nos. 11371/2015, 11372/2015, 11374/2015, 11378/2015, 11379/2015 and 11380/2015, is to the order dated 27.10.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and order dated 06.11.2015 in W. P. (C) No. 11377/2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.

¶16

W. P. (C) Nos. 11371/2015, 11372/2015, 11374/2015, 11377-80/2015

¶17

Page 2 of 3

¶18

The Tribunal had disposed of the OAs filed by the petitioner with following directions :

¶19

“In the totality of the facts and circumstances, the OAs are disposed of with direction to DOP&T to examine whether even such candidates who were eligible to take CSE 2011 or had taken 2012 or 2013 or 2014 examination should also be given another chance to take Civil Services Exam with changed pattern in 2015 when the CSAT is made qualifying examination. Such decision may be taken by DOP&T within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No Costs.

¶20

Aggrieved by the aforesaid directions, the present writ petitions have been filed.

¶21

Mr. Naresh Kaushik, learned counsel appearing for UPSC has handed over a copy of order dated 02.12.2015 passed by the DoPT in compliance with the directions of the Tribunal. By a speaking order, the DoPT has declined the request of the petitioners and has rendered reasons for the same. Copy of the order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners, who seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petitions with leave to file the fresh petitions in accordance with law.

¶22

Accordingly, these writ petitions along with all pending applications are disposed of. Leave granted, as prayed.

¶23

Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Master.

¶24

G.S.SISTANI, J

¶25

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J

¶26

DECEMBER 08, 2015 / gr

¶27

W. P. (C) Nos. 11371/2015, 11372/2015, 11374/2015, 11377-80/2015

¶28

Page 3 of 3

Raiyaz Ali v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raiyaz Ali v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.C.D. Vs Ram Milan & Anr.

Brijesh Singh Vs Bhai Mati Dass Co-Operative Urban, T & C Society, Ltd.

G.M.Gouzamng Kuki @ G.M.Kuki Vs UOI and Ors.

Vinod Malhotra Vs UOI and Anr.

Lok Jagriti Vs Union of India and Ors.

Lokender Kumar Tyagi Vs Union of India and Ors.

S.P.Singh Vs B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd.

Jai Pal Chand Jain Vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd.

Jawahar Lal Upadhyay Vs Union of India & Anr.

Union of India Vs Rupesh Kumar Mann & Ors.

Ram Kishan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rushikesh Ramchandra Dudhat Vs Union of India & Anr.

Seema Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Subhash Chander Sharma