The High Court of Delhi disposed of an appeal, holding the challenge infructuous due to a subsequent settlement between parties. The final decree challenged was declared invalid and non-operative.
The appeal was dismissed; the final decree dated 25.02.2008 was declared no longer valid or operative against the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHRI NIRMAL OBEROI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Ms.Shyel Trehan with Mr.Nikhil Pillai, Advocates.
versus
SHRI RAJIV OBEROI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Gaurav Puri with Ms.Sugandha, Advocates for Respondents No.4 to 8.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (ORAL)
%
RFA(OS) 52/2008 Page 1 of 2
was exhibited as Ex.’C’. Learned counsel states that though indicated in the application seeking compromise that instant appeal also should be disposed of in terms of the compromise settlement, for unexplainable reasons, concurrent order could not be passed in the instant appeal.
4. No costs.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG (JUDGE)
PRATIBHA RANI (JUDGE)
JANUARY 03, 2012 st
RFA(OS) 52/2008 Page 2 of 2
Shri Nirmal Oberoi & Ors.
Shri Rajiv Oberoi & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
