Anil Sharma & Ors. v. State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court quashed an FIR and proceedings for Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC, deeming continuation of trial useless due to parties signing an agreement to settle disputes.
What did the court decide?
FIR No.319/2005 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and all other proceedings were quashed.
What the court decided
Signature Not Verified IPC, registeredat police stationMukherjeeNagar. He further states that no Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
\
x
useful purpose will be served in continuingwith the criminal proceedings 1 I sincethe partieshave amicablysettle^theirdisputes.
Ms. Jasbir Kaur, counsel for the State, also agrees with the aforesaid position.
Counsel for Smt. Anju Sharma identifies her. Let her statementbe recorded.
Statement of the respondent No2, Smt. Anju Sharma, has been recorded separately.
In view of the submissionsmade by counsel for the parties,and what has been stated by the respondentNo.2, Smt. Anju Sharma, it would be proper that the matterbe put on rest as no useful purpose will be served in continuingwith the trial proceedings.
In this view of the matter, FIR No.319/2005,dated 20^*^ July, 2005, under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC, registeredat police station Mukherjee Nagar, and all otherproceedingsemanatingtherefromagainstall the accused personsarehereby quashed.
Thispetitionstandsdisposedof
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings should be continued considering the plea of not useful purpose served.
Whether FIR No.319/2005 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC should be quashed.
Whether the parties' amplitude to settle disputes justifies quashing of criminal proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Anju Sharma
- respondent
The State
Coram
N. Sudershan Kumar Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court