Chowkhandi Road, Tilak Nagar. The plea that the petitioner should be treated at par with M/s. Sant Raj Ram Singh also did not find favour with the appellant. It is contended by Mr. Verma, learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent Nos.2 and 3 have waived production of the electricity or water bills and in fact they were never asked. It is urged by him that his case was rejected solely on the ground that he was not a licencee in respect of the said market and never carried on business. It is contended by him that the said conclusion arrived at by the departmental authority, which has been given the stamp of approval by the leaned single Judge, is incorrect. He has drawn our attention to page 33 (Annexure A-1) to highlight that an application for licence was filed and deposit was made on 16th November, 1988. Learned counsel has invited our attention at page 73, which is the letter dated 24th April, 2009 issued by the Secretary, APMC. Be it noted, the said letter has been issued under the RTI Act, 2005. We think it appropriate to reproduce the said letter in
