Dev Raj & Ors. v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner secured quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC after reaching a settlement with the respondent, who agreed to drop the proceedings following full payment of claims.
What did the court decide?
FIR No. 183/2004 and proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
What the court decided
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data i s as p er the physical file and no page is missing.
3
and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioners have to pay ^ 1.5 laldis out of which ^'l laldi has already been paid to her and remaining ^55,000/- has been paid in cash in the Court today. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 183/2004 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Dabri and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in aclcnowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition application is disposed of. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J
NOVEMBER 11, 2011/vlaTi
\M./
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed upon settlement between parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court