In a contempt proceeding regarding possession of official accommodation, the high court granted Smt. Pushpa time to vacate. Upon vacation, held-up pension arrears were directed to be released in her favor pending future proceedings on retirement.
Wife granted time until September 30, 2011 to vacate; pension arrears of 6,00,000/- to be released in her favor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IFCI LIMITED ..... Petitioner/Relator Through: Mr. Dinkar Singh, Adv.
Versus
NARENDER KUMAR ..... Respondent/Alleged Contemnor Through: Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R % 17.08.2011
and which proceedings are still pending. She further states that the respondent / alleged contemnor has intentionally given an undertaking in this Court to vacate the accommodation so as to oust her from the said accommodation.
15,000/- to 17,000/- per month shall commence. Finding that in the order dated 25th February, 2011 (supra), it is recorded that petitioner / relator is holding retiral benefits of about `6,00,000/- of the respondent / alleged contemnor, the status thereof was enquired. It is stated that the same are towards arrears of pension / computation pension and which would also become payable to the respondent / alleged contemnor immediately on delivery of possession of the accommodation aforesaid.understanding from the counsel who was earlier appearing for him, has stated that for the lapse committed by him in not informing to the Court on 7th February, 2011 that in fact it was his wife who was in possession, he is willing that all the arrears of `6,00,000/- or more which are due to him from petitioner / relator, be released directly to his wife Smt. Pushpa for her benefit and benefit of his daughter, who is of marriageable age, and which amount be taken into consideration by the Courts where the other proceedings between the respondent / alleged contemnor and his wife Smt. Pushpa are pending.
accommodation vacated latest by 7th October, 2011;
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
AUGUST 17, 2011 ‘gsr’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the high court can expedite the vacancy of official accommodation pending other proceeding.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
IFCI Limited
Narender Kumar
Smt. Pushpa
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court