The court disposed of the petition based on a letter from the petitioner confirming that the respondent had handed over vacant possession of the disputed premises, resolving the controversy.
Petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data i s as p er the physical file and no page is missing.
letter filed by the petitioner along with his petition dated 03.01.2011 is relevant and resolves the controversy between the parties as this specifically states that the vacant possession of the disputed premises has been handed over to the petitioner by the respondent. This letter further records that these premises have been received to the satisfaction and in terms of the undertakings given to the court. In view of this factual scenario, nothing else survives in this petition.
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
AUGUST 08, 2011 rb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survives given the respondent has handed over vacant possession of the disputed premises.
petitioner
respondent
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
