Appeal against refusal of promotion. Court accepted Institute counsel's submission that appeal under Section 22A of the Act is not maintainable as the case is not in the First Schedule since punishment requires HC acceptance. Appeal dismissed.
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
)
awarded. The communicationdated 04.4.20LL (supra) states that the Institute has decided to recommendpunishment of "reprimand"and to make reference to the High Courtfor its approval.
?
t
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SAHAI ENDLAW, J
NOVEMBER 09' ZOLL|pnc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal under Section 22A of the Act is maintainable when the case does not fall within the First Schedule.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Institute
Appellant
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
SAHAI
ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
