The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to review. The interim order continued for four weeks thereafter.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to approach Tribunal for review; interim order extended for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Date of Decision: August 11, 2011
P.S. BAHL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT. OF DELHI & ORS. ….. Respondents Through Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.5.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
WP(C) No.8314/2010
Page 1 of 2
contentions raised by the petitioner in the writ petition which will be open for challenge.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
AUGUST 11, 2011 dr
WP(C) No.8314/2010
Page 2 of 2
P.S. Bahl
GOVT. OF NCT. OF DELHI
Anil Kumar
Sudershan Kumar Misra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
