Vinod Kumar Singh v. Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs
Case brief
What is this about?
Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
% Date of decision: 02.12.2011
Constable Vinod Kumar Singh
…. Petitioner
Through Mr. Satish Pandey, Mr. Shailender K. Misra and Mr. Rajender Sahu, Advocates
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
…. Respondents
Through Nemo
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J.
CM No. 18409/2011
For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and delay in
re-filing the petition is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
WP(C) No.8174/2011
Page 1 of 2
WP(C) No. 8174/2011
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the petition afresh after taking all the pleas and contentions available to the petitioner.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
December 02, 2011. rs
WP(C) No.8174/2011
Page 2 of 2
Constable Vinod Kumar Singh
Union of India
Anil Kumar
Sudershan Kumar Misra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court