Single Judge High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding temporary employment status and the non-application of 'last to come first to go' on an all-India basis in a site-specific context.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
+ Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5850/2011
% Date of Decision: August 12, 2011
Shri Bal Kishan & Ors. ....Petitioner
Through Ms. Maninder Acharya with Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocates.
VERSUS
Union of India & Ors. …..Respondents Through Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
ORDER
The present writ petition filed by 16 petitioners impugns the
order dated 12th May, 2010, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal, for short)
the petitioners were granted temporary status and even if they are
not entitled to regularization, the respondent could have continued with their employment after preparing an all India
WPC 5850/2011 Page 1 of 3
seniority list. It is submitted that the principle of last to come first to go, has not been adhered to by the respondent.
WPC 5850/2011 Page 2 of 3
present writ petition and the same is dismissed in limine.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHIEF JUSTICE
August 12, 2011 kkb
WPC 5850/2011
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the principle of 'last to come first to go' should be applied on an all-India basis when the appellant was appointed for specific work at a site that was later handed over.
Whether the Tribunal's rejection of the merit of the writ petition correctly followed the law.
Shri Bal Kishan & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
Sanjiv Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
