Ravi Raj Mandle v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
WPS No. 9052 of 2019, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 04.02.2026 by Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (neutral citation 2026:CGHC:6340, marked NAFR). Petitioners: Ravi Raj Mandle, Atmaram Bhardwaj, Mukesh Kumar Verma, Sameer Pandey, Ludheshwar Prasad (counsel: Vijay Chawla appearing for Naushina Afrin Ali). Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Home (Police) Department), DGP, ADGP (Recruitment/selection), DIG (Administration) (counsel: Government Advocate Rahul Tamaskar). Petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's statement; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited; no costs or amounts awarded.
What did the court decide?
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners that the petition has rendered infructuous, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. ¶24