Dismissed¶¶28

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC27 Jul 2026WPS/8655/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; WPS No. 8655 of 2023; decided 28.07.2026 by Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi. Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh (Employment and Training Department), Director, Directorate of Employment and Training, and Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (Vyapam). Petition challenged Annexure-P/1 declaring the petitioner ineligible for the post of Training Officer (Computer Operator & Programming Assistant); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh better constituted petition; pending IAs disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh better constituted petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn and pending interlocutory application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶¶28

Amit Kumar Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010351782023

2026:CGHC:32275

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 8655 of 2023

¶7

Amit Kumar Sharma S/o Janardan Sharma Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. 92, Ward No.14 Shriji Colony, Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Employment And Training Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

2 - Director Directorate Of Employment And Training Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-4, First Floor, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

3 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (Vyapam) Through Its Secretary, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner	:	Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate
For Respondents 1 & 2/State	:	Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer
For Respondent No.3	:	Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate

¶15

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

28.07.2026

¶18

1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):-

¶19

10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased set-aside/quash the impugned Annexure-P/1 whereby the candidature of petitioner

¶20

Digitally
signed by
BINI
BINI PRADEEP
PRADEEP Date:
2026.07.29
17:37:02
+0530

¶21

¶22

has been declared ineligible for appointment on the post of Training Officer (Computer Operator & Programmign Assistant).

¶23

10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the candidature of petitioner eligible & consider the candidature of petitioner for appointment on the post of Training Officer (Computer Operator & Programming Assistant) with all consequential benefits.

¶24

10.3 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other writ/writs, order/ orders, relief/reliefs in favour of the petitioners, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioners.

¶25

2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition.

¶26

3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed.

¶27

4. Having considered the aforesaid prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as prayed for.

¶28

5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶29

6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶32

Judge

¶33

Bini

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Reema Gendre Vs Devendra Kumar Gendre

Hemendra Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shri H.C. Saxena Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kiran Sethi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kiran Yadav Vs Wallfort Properties Private Limited

Budhram Khande Vs South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd.