Shubhanchhi Pandey v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Short non-merits order (marked NAFR) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, dated 27/01/2026, in WPS No. 854 of 2026 (neutral citation 2026:CGHC:4364), Shubhanchhi Pandey v. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, DoPT / Staff Selection Commission. Bench: Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge. Counsel: T.K. Jha for petitioner; R.K. Mishra (DSGI) with Sweta Rai for respondent. On the respondent's objection, petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to pursue alternate remedy; the Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty as prayed for. No issues framed, no statutes or precedents discussed; of no value on merits, useful only to show the practice of dismissal on withdrawal with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy available under the law.