Dismissed¶¶24

Manish Meshram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Jun 2026WPS/7973/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh HC (Bilaspur) dismisses as infructuous WPS No. 7973 of 2022 (decided 16/06/2026, Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey): writ petition by Manish Meshram seeking addition of his name to the list issued by the Principal Government Accounts Training School, Raipur (respondent no. 3) and inclusion in the accounting training session 2022-23; session already ended; State represented by Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer; petitioner unrepresented; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Since the Accounting Training Session 2022-23 has already come to an end, the petition has become infructuous, and the petition is accordingly dismissed being rendered infructuous. ¶¶24

Manish Meshram Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.06.17 10:51:50 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:24142

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 7973 of 2022

¶7

*** -** Manish Meshram S/o Late Maniram Meshram Aged About 42 Years Caste Mahar, R/o Tulsipur Bakhtawarchal Street No. 9 Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Home And Jail Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

2 - Inspector General Of Police Jail And Rehabilitation Services, Jail Headquarter Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

3 - The Principal Government Accounts Training School, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents/State : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer

¶15

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶16

16/06/2026

¶17

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-

¶18

“ 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respondents.

¶19

10.2 That, may this Hon’ble Court kindly issue a suitable writ to add the name of the petitioner in the list issued by the respondent no. 3.

¶20

10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent no. 1 to 3, that the petitioner should be included in the accounting training session 2022-23.

¶21

¶22

10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice.”

¶23

It appears that the petitioner has claimed inclusion of his name for Accounting Training Session 2022-23.

¶24

As the Session 2022-23 has already come to an end, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous.

¶25

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶26

vatti

Manish Meshram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Meshram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

David Prasad Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vipin Sinha Vs Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit

Ram Avtar Dhruv Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Sharma Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kunti Jaiswal, Vs State of Chhattisgarh