Santosh Maravi S/o Late Panchan Ram Aged About 25 Years R/o Village And Gram Panchayat Nawadih, Post- Tatapani, Police StationRamanujganj, Tahsil Balrampur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI SHARMA SHARMA Date: 2026.09.18 17:31:39 +0530

¶11

1. The Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Department Of Atomic Energy, Government Of India, New Delhi

¶12

2. The Assistant Personnel Officer Atomic Minerals Directorate For Exploration And Research (Amd), Department Of Atomic Energy, Amd Complex, Civil Lines, Nagpur (Maharashtra)- 440001

¶13

		... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate along with Mr. Poshan Kumar, Advocate
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. R.K. Mishra, DSGI along with Ms. Naitika Sahu, Advocate

¶14

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

18/09/2026

Heard.

Learned counsel appearing for the Union of India submits that the petitioner is an employee of respondent No. 2 and, therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable before this Court, as the

¶19

¶20

petitioner has an alternative remedy of approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) having jurisdiction at Nagpur.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to avail the remedy available to the petitioner under law.

¶22

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Jyoti

Santosh Maravi v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Santosh Maravi v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases