Disposed

Naresh Kumar Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Sept 2026WPS/6781/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in WPS No. 6781 of 2026 directs respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding cadre absorption discrepancy. The direction is to follow the State Government circular dated 07.08.2026 within fifty days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider and decide the pending representation within 50 days in accordance with Circular dated 07.08.2026.

Naresh Kumar Patel Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CGHC010348172026

2026:CGHC:40383

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 6781 of 2026

¶7

1 - Naresh Kumar Patel S/o Late Ghanshyam Singh Patel Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Kirari, Tehsil Dabhra, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh

¶8

AMARDEEP CHOUBEY

¶9

Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.09.17 10:47:41 +0530

¶10

... Petitioner

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secratory, Department Of Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

2 - Director Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Office At 1st Floor, C- Block, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

3 - Joint Director Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶15

4 - District Education Officer Sakti District- Sakti (Chhattisgarh)

¶16

5 - District Education Officer District- Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (Chhattisgarh)

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. S.S. Baghel, G.A.

¶20

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶21

Order on Board

¶22

16/09/2026

¶23

The present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-

¶24

“10.1 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct

¶25

the respondents for deciding the representation as per

¶26

¶27

letter dated 07.08.2026.

¶28

10.2 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, though the petitioner was working as a Teacher in the E-Cadre, his absorption as a Teacher has been made in the T-Cadre. Such absorption is not in accordance with the circular issued by the State Government dated 07.08.2026 (Annexure P-2). Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation seeking correction of his absorption, which is pending consideration before the Joint Director (Education), Division Bilaspur. He, therefore, prays that an appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated period.

¶30

Learned counsel for the State submits that, if the representation of the petitioner is still pending, the same shall be considered in accordance with the Circular issued by the State Government dated 07.08.2026, after examining and verifying the status of the petitioner, within a period of fifty days.

¶31

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings as well as the material available on record.

¶32

Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with a

¶33

¶34

direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-1), in accordance with the Circular dated 07.08.2026, after duly examining and verifying the status of the petitioner, within a period of fifty days from the date

¶35

of receipt of a copy of this order. SD/-

¶36

(BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE

¶37

Amardeep

Naresh Kumar Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases