Vikky Soni v. Kulpati
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur, WPS No. 6302 of 2018 (neutral reference 2026:CGHC:27033), decided 02.07.2026 by Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J. Petition by Vikky Soni, a daily-wage employee (Dainik Vetan Bhogi Karmi), against the Kulpati and Kulsachiv of Surguja Vishwavidhayalay Ambikapur, the Sanyukt Sachiv (Joint Secretary), Higher Education Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, and the Collector, Surguja. Petition dismissed at the threshold on counsel's plea of no instruction, with liberty reserved to revive the prayer if the cause of action survives. Marked NAFR (not approved for reporting). No statutory provisions, precedents, framed issues, or merits findings appear in the order.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to revive the prayer if the cause of action still survives. ¶22