Disposed¶27

Smt. Urmila Khalkho v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Mar 2026WPS/6202/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPS No. 6202 of 2022; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; National Lok Adalat award dated 14/03/2026; Smt. Urmila Khalkho v. State of Chhattisgarh; transfer order dated 09.09.2022 (Annexure P/1); Primary School Gadhabahri to Primary School Rajata; Vikas Khand Sitapur; Janpad Panchayat Sitapur; District Surguja (Ambikapur); compromise application; amicable settlement; petitioner willing to withdraw; petition disposed of; Judge-Lok Adalat Amitendra Kishore Prasad; Member-Lok Adalat Apoorva Tripathi; petitioner in person; Dy GA Kawal Jeet Singh Saini for State/Respondents.

What did the court decide?

The parties' compromise/settlement was accepted by the Lok Adalat and the petitioner withdrew the petition; the instant petition is disposed of. ¶27

Smt. Urmila Khalkho Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

AVINASH SHARMA

¶5

Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.03.16 10:48:14 +0530

¶6

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶7

Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate.

¶8

WPS No. 6202 of 2022

¶9

1 - Smt. Urmila Khalkho W/o Chuntho Khalkho, Aged About 50 Years R/o. Jovatikra, Ward No. 1, Nagar, Panchayat Sitapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur).

¶10

... Petitioner.

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

2 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

¶14

3 - Collector, Ambikapur,, District : Surguja Chhattisgarh.

¶15

4 - Block Education Officer, Sitapur,, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

¶16

... Respondents.

¶17

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Smt. Urmila Khalkho, petitioner in person before this Court.

¶19

For State/Respondent(s) : Shri Kawal Jeet Singh Saini, Dy GA and Shri Vivek Dubey, Nodal Officer, School Education.

¶20

¶21

AWARD

¶22

(Passed on 14/03/2026)

¶23

The present petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 09.09.2022 (Annexure P/1) whereby petitioner has been transferred from Primary School Gadhabahri, Vikas Khand Sitapur to Primary School Rajata Vikas Khand Sitapur.

¶24

Today, both the parties filed compromise application stating that the petitioner is willing to withdraw this petition as nothing remains for adjudication in this matter.

¶25

In that view of the matter that contesting parties to this petition have amicably settled/compromised the dispute. We have also found that the terms and conditions of the compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties.

¶26

A copy of this compromise/docket arrived at by the parties be made part of this record.

¶27

Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of.

¶28

Sd/Sd/-

¶29

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Apoorva Tripathi) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh

¶30

Avinash

Smt. Urmila Khalkho v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Urmila Khalkho v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Yadav Vs Ganeshuram

Ramesh Prasad Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shri Dilip Kumar Yadav Vs the Asst. Commissioner Tribal Development

Sahas Das Mahant Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aditya Yadav Vs Priyanshu Tiwari

Gram Panchayat Barduli, Vs State of Chhattisgarh