J.R. Bhagat Vs State of Chhattisgarh

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mahandi Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

2. Under Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralaya Mahandi Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶13

4. Sanat Mahadeva Assistant Project Officer, In-Charge Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh District- Bemetara (C.G.)

¶14

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sibasish Mishra, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Garry Mukhopadhyay, Addl A.G.

¶15

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

23/06/2026

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is

¶20

2

¶21

suffering from acute abdominal issues and is undergoing treatment at Apollo Hospital, Bilaspur. It is further submitted that the petitioner has annexed the relevant medical documents along with the writ petition and, on the said medical ground, prays for reconsideration of his transfer from the present place of posting to Pithora, District Mahasamund.

¶22

Learned State counsel submits that under the transfer policy, a Committee has been constituted by the State Government for redressal of grievances relating to transfer matters. It is submitted that if the petitioner raises his grievance before the said Committee, particularly on the ground of medical hardship, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and the transfer policy of the State Government, and an appropriate decision shall be taken within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the petition.

¶24

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and particularly taking into account the medical condition of the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Transfer Redressal Committee raising the medical grounds, within a reasonable time.

¶25

In the event such representation is submitted by the petitioner, the

¶26

3

¶27

Transfer Redressal Committee shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with the applicable transfer policy and law, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

Jyoti

J.R. Bhagat v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.R. Bhagat v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhattisgarh State Hostel Superintendent Association Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Fulsingh Kanwar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kaushilya Bai And Ors. Vs Shri Ajay Pal Singh And Ors.

Smt. Sangita Deep Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bedram Chauhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sambhu Kumar Ojha Vs South Eastern Coalfield Limited