Dismissed¶24

Patel Ram Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC18 Jun 2026WPS/4193/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (WPS No. 4193 of 2026, Chhattisgarh HC, Bilaspur, Bibhu Datta Guru, J., 19/06/2026) by an Accountant seeking release of full suspension-period salary and annual increment from 2020; State reported departmental enquiry completed and charge proved; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy. Keywords: suspension period salary; annual increment; departmental enquiry; charge sheet; dismissal as withdrawn; alternative remedy; Tribal Development Department; Surguja/Ambikapur.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy available under law. ¶24

Patel Ram Rajwade Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:24975

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 4193 of 2026

¶6

JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.06.19 17:23:22 +0530

¶7

Patel Ram Rajwade S/o Shri Shivratan Ram Rajwade Aged About 58 Years Working On The Post Of Accountant, Government Higher Secondary School, Puhputra, Lakhanpur, Permanent R/o Kharsiya Road, Village Shrigarh, Behind Suraj Bus, Ambikapur, Post Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶11

2. Collector (Tribal Development) Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶12

3. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶13

4. District Education Officer Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶14

5. Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Puhputra, Block Lakhanpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶15

... Respondent(s)

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. V. K. Pandey, Advocate
For Respondents/	: Mr. Lav Sharma, P.L.
State

¶17

¶18

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

19/06/2026

Heard.

By the present writ petition the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to release the full salary of suspension period of the petitioner and also sought a direction to the respondents the annual increment to the petitioner from 2020 till date.

¶23

At the very outset, learned State counsel submits that in the present case, the departmental enquiry has been contemplated against the petitioner; charge sheet was issued and on completion of the enquiry the charge has been proved against the petitioner.

¶24

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy available under law.

¶25

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Jyoti

Patel Ram Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patel Ram Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Tahira Begum Vs Akhtar Husain

Suresh Kumar Jaiswal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt. Chandmani Nayak @ Chandramani Nayak

Shiv Charan Sahu Vs Managing Director

Tonkodhar Kumhar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanjay Pandey Vs Roktima Yadav