Disposed¶26

Smt. Pratima Patanwar, v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Jul 2026WPS/4075/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh HC Bilaspur, WPS No. 4075 of 2022 (decided 06.07.2026, Rakesh Mohan Pandey J.): writ petition by Smt. Pratima Patanwar against recovery orders dated 19.05.2022 and 25.04.2022 of respondent no. 4 (Block Health Officer, CHC Bilha); disposed of after State reported revocation of recovery and refund directions vide order dated 15.09.2023; no statutory provisions or precedents discussed; no monetary quantum stated.

What did the court decide?

No independent relief adjudicated or granted by the Court; the petition was disposed of in view of the State's own order dated 15.09.2023 revoking the recovery and directing refund of the amount, if any, recovered, which was taken on record. ¶26

Smt. Pratima Patanwar, Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010191272022

2026:CGHC:27786

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 4075 of 2022

¶7

1 - Smt. Pratima Patanwar, W/o Shri Vidya Sagar Patanwar Aged About 57 Years R/o House No. 256, Kapil Nagar Sarkanda, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Health Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

2 - Chief Medical And Health Offier Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶12

3 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶13

4 - Block Health Officer Community Health Centre Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶14

5 - District Treasury Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶15

---- Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner : Ms. Shradhha Mishra, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For State : Ms. Soumya Sharma, PL

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶18

06.07.2026

¶19

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-

¶20

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner.

¶21

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned orders dated 19.05.2022 (ANNEXURE P/1) & 25.04.2022 (ANNEXURE P/2) issued by respondent no. 4, with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice.

¶22

-2-

¶23

10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.”

¶24

Ms. Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would submit that the order of recovery has already been revoked and directions have been issued to refund the amount, if any, recovered vide order dated 15.09.2023.

¶25

Having considered the submissions made by Ms. Sharma, the order dated 15.09.2023 is taken on record.

¶26

As the order of recovery has already been withdrawn and directions for refund of the recovered amount have been issued, this petition is disposed of .

¶27

Sd/(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶28

Rekha

Smt. Pratima Patanwar, v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Pratima Patanwar, v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lingraj Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., 319, Lingraj Steel, Samta Colony, Raipur (C G), Vs Assistant Commissioner S G S T

Smt. Vrinda Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pradeep Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jai Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vikas Kumar Rathiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nitesh Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh