Seraphinus Minj Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

2026:CGHC:21573

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 3806 of 2026

¶6

Seraphinus Minj S/o Late Agapit Minj Aged About 51 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Lohandiguda, Block Lohandiguda, District -Bastar (C.G.)

¶7

Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI SHARMA SHARMA Date: 2026.05.09 11:08:01 +0530

¶8

versus

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

3. Secretary Chhattisgarh State Open School, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

4. Divisional Joint Director Education Division Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.)

¶14

5. District Education Officer Bastar, District - Bastar (C.G.)

¶15

6. Block Education Officer Lohandiguda, District -Bastar (C.G.)

¶16

		... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Govind Prasad Dewangan, Advocate
For Respondents/	:	Ms. Sakshi Bajpai, P.L.
State
For Respondent	:	Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
No. 3

¶17

2

¶18

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

08/05/2026

Heard.

1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relifs:-

¶23

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in relates to the case of the petitioner from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal.

¶24

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of annual increments after revocation of his suspension order dated 26.02.2024 and after joining his duty at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Lohandiguda, Block Lohandiguda, District Bastar on 03.06.2024 with consequential benefits.

¶25

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to conclude the Departmental Proceeding within a stipulated period as the Departmental Proceeding is pending for consideration since 16.10.2024, when the charge sheet was issued against the petitioner.

¶26

10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief's in favour of the petitioners, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.”

¶27

3

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a departmental enquiry proceeding has been initiated against the petitioner by the School Education Department vide communication dated 16.10.2024, which is still pending consideration. It is further submitted that on account of the pendency of the said departmental enquiry, the annual increment to which the petitioner is otherwise entitled has not been released. Hence, learned counsel prays for disposal of the present writ petition with a limited direction to the concerned authority to conclude the departmental enquiry within a stipulated period.

¶29

Learned State counsel submits that the departmental proceeding pending against the petitioner shall be concluded within a period of six months.

¶30

In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to conclude the departmental enquiry proceeding pending against the petitioner, initiated vide communication dated 16.10.2024, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

¶34

Jyoti

Seraphinus Minj v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seraphinus Minj v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Anjana Tirkey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tej Kumar Tirkey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Satish Shukla Vs Shri Ajit Vasant

Khido Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mithilesh Prasad Vs P.S. Mishra

Shri Purushottam Singh Bhalavi Vs State of Chhattisgarh