Disposed¶21

Gunnu Gop v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Chhattisgarh HC17 Feb 2026WPS/3480/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gunnu Gop v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited & Anr., WPS No. 3480 of 2019, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Single Bench, Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.), decided 18.02.2026. Interest on delayed payment; notification dated 01.10.1997; balance 4% interest after statutory rate misconstrued as 6% instead of 10%; SECL, Churcha Mines (Ro), Baikunthpur Area, Churcha Colliery, District Korea; respondents' additional affidavit and undertaking to pay within one month; writ petition disposed of finally; no cost.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of finally; respondents to pay the balance 4% interest as per notification dated 01.10.1997 within one month from the date of the order; no cost. ¶21

Gunnu Gop Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:8690

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 3480 of 2019

¶6

Gunnu Gop S/o Late Maduli Gop Aged About 69 Years R/o Talbapara, Baikunthpur, Near Petrol Pump Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Digitally SAIFAN signed by KHAN SAIFAN KHAN

¶9

Versus

¶10

1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Head Office, Basant Vihar, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

2 - Sub Area Manager S.E.C.L. Kusmunda, Churcha Mines (Ro), Baikunthpur Area, Churcha Colliery, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh

¶12

... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. VR Tiwari, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Atul Kumar Keshwani, Advocate

¶13

Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board)

¶14

18.02.2026

¶15

1. In compliance of this Court’s order dated 30.01.2026, the respondents have filed additional affidavit and in Para-5 & 6 it has been stated as under:

¶16

"05. That, after going through the case of the petitioner it has been found by the management that the petitioner is entitled for balance 4% of the interest amount on account of the delayed payment as per the above notification and the sanction for the same has already been granted. The payment of the balance 4% of interest amount has

¶17

¶18

already been initiated and the same is expected to be credited to the account of the petitioner within 02 months time (approx.).

¶19

06. That, it is submitted that the said part payment was made on account of the fact that the statutory rate of interest was misconstrued as 6% instead of 10%. This was the reason only 6% interest amount could be paid to the petitioner, however now the respondents have already proceeded with the claim of the petitioner for payment of balance 4% of the interest amount."

¶20

2. A careful perusal of the aforesaid paragraph would show that the payment of balance 4% interest as per notification dated 01.10.1997 has already been processed and same will be paid to the petitioner forthwith. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the said payment of amount to the extent of 4% interest as per notification dated 01.10.1997 will be paid to the petitioner within a period of 01 month from today.

¶21

3. In view of aforesaid submission, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of finally. No cost.

¶22

s@if

Gunnu Gop v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gunnu Gop v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niladhar Pradhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramashish Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chandan Dadsena Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ghanshyam Sinha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Narendra Awasthi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dhanawa Ram Janghel Vs State of Chhattisgarh