Dismissed¶¶38

Vikas Patre v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Jan 2026WPS/3079/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPS No. 3079 of 2023; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Vikas Patre and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others; Sub-Engineer, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur / Bhilai; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; permission to withdraw granted; Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad (Single Bench); order dated 06.01.2026; NAFR; no merits adjudicated; no statute or precedent considered.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with no substantive relief adjudicated. ¶¶38

Vikas Patre Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 3079 of 2023

¶5

1 - Vikas Patre S/o Umashankar Patel Aged About 32 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

Digitally VISHAKHA signed by BEOHAR VISHAKHA BEOHAR

¶7

2 - Shankar Suvam Markam S/o Manohar Lal Markam Aged About 34 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶8

3 - Shashi Ware D/o Late Rameshwar Ware Aged About 30 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

4 - Meenu Bhagat D/o Jagmohan Ram Bhagat Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

5 - Varsha Sahu D/o Arun Kumar Sahu Aged About 30 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

6 - Ashish Pandey S/o Late Shri Baldau Prasad Pandey Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

7 - Shweta Verma D/o Chowa Ram Verma Aged About 30 Years

¶13

¶14

Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶15

... Petitioner(s)

¶16

versus

¶17

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶18

2 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶19

3 - Additional Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶20

4 - Gagan Vasan Aged About 33 Years, Presently Posted As SubEngineer At State Urban Development Authority Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶21

5 - Binod Yadav Aged About 36 Years Presently Posted As SubEngineer At Municipal Council Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶22

6 - Bhimendra Kumar Gautam Aged About 33 Years, Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶23

7 - Rashmi Bhowmana Aged About 30 Years, Presently Posted As SubEngineer At Municipal Corporation Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶24

8 - Jyoti Sahu Aged About 29 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶25

9 - Kiran Tirkey Aged About 29 Years Presently Posted As SubEngineer At Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur,

¶26

¶27

Chhattisgarh

¶28

10 - Rakesh Kumar Sidar Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Nagar Panchayat Charama District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh

¶29

... Respondents

¶30

(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)

¶31

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For State :- Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. A.G. For Respondents No. 2 & 3 :-Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate

¶32

SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order On Board

06.01.2026

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.

¶37

3. The prayer is fair and reasonable.

¶38

4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶39

sd/-

¶40

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶41

Vishakha

Vikas Patre v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Patre v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Vs Smt. Kunti Gop

Vishnu Kumar Modi Vs National Insurance Company Limited

Mulchand Thakur Vs National Mineral Development Corporation (Nmdc)

Ku. Masoom Rathod Vs State of Chhattisgarh

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Purana Bai

Mrs. B. Ekka Vs State of Chhattisgarh