Dismissed¶30

Shri Mukesh Patnayak v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC27 Jan 2026WPS/2865/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mukesh Patnayak v. State of Chhattisgarh and police officials; WPS No. 2922 of 2023 and WPS No. 2865 of 2024; writ petitions dismissed for non-instructions/non-prosecution (petitioner failed to file rejoinder); liberty to revive reserved; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; order dated 28/01/2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to revive the Writ Petitions, if the petitioner so desires. ¶30

Shri Mukesh Patnayak Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:4769

NAFR

Digitally AVINASH signed by SHARMA AVINASH SHARMA

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 2922 of 2023

¶7

Shri Mukesh Patnayak S/o G.N. Patnayak Aged About 49 Years R/o Ayodhya Nagar Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

¶8

--- Petitioner.

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P.S. Civil Line, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

3 - The Superintendent Of Police Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

¶13

4 - Inspector General Of Police, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

--- Respondents.

¶15

WPS No. 2865 of 2024

¶16

Shri Mukesh Patnayak S/o G.N. Patnayak Aged About 50 Years R/o Police Quarter Bemcha Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.)

¶17

--- Petitioner.

¶18

Versus

¶19

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶20

¶21

2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P.S. Civil Line, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶22

3 - The Superintendent Of Police Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.).

¶23

4 - The Inspector General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶24

--- Respondents.

¶25

For Petitioner	: Shri Badruddin Khan, Advocate.
For State/Respondent	: Shri Hariom Rai, PL.

¶26

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶27

Order on Board

¶28

28/01/2026

¶29

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite of information sent to the petitioner, he is not coming forward to file rejoinder etc. and it seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the cases.

¶30

In view of the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petitions are dismissed due to non instructions from the petitioner. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the Writ Petitions,

¶31

if he so desires.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶34

Avinash

Shri Mukesh Patnayak v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Mukesh Patnayak v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girdhari Sahu Vs Phuleshwari Bai

Rakesh Kumar Sahu Vs Thalendra Kumar @ Rupesh Kumar Sahu

Suman Kumari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tata A.I.G. General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt. Samarinbai

Ashvan Kumar Katlam Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Tekram Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh