Ghanshyam Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Short single-judge order of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissing WPS No. 2715 of 2023 as infructuous by efflux of time, on the petitioner's own counsel's submission (order dated 03/07/2026). Petitioner: Ghanshyam Sen. Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (through Secretary, General Administration Department); Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. through its Executive Engineer (Civil); its Deputy General Manager (HR); and private respondent Nandinee Sen. Counsel: Lukesh Kumar Mishra (through VC) for petitioner; Shailja Shukla, Govt. Advocate for Respondent 1; Krishna Tandon for Respondents 2 and 3; Sunil Verma with Mahesh Kumar Sharma for Respondent 4. No statutory provisions or case law discussed and no quantum involved; the order has no precedential value and is useful mainly for confirming the disposal of this petition.
What did the court decide?
On the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition had rendered infructuous by efflux of time, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.