Petitioner in a writ petition against the Forest Department died during pendency and no instructions were received from his legal representatives. The High Court dismissed the writ petition but permitted the legal representatives to revive the prayer if the cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2026:CGHC:19091
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2000 of 2021
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.04.25 14:09:03 +0530
versus
For Petitioner : Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For State : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board
25.04.2026
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
JUDGE
$iddhant
Ramnath Ram
State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
Chief Conservator of Forest, Surguja Forest Division, Ambikapur Surguja Chhattisgarh
Divisional Forest Officer, Surguja Forest Division, Ambikapur Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
