Disposed¶31

Parmeshwar Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jan 2026WPS/13276/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regularization in service; pension and retiral dues with interest; qualification under Rules, 1979; Municipal Corporation Bhilai; Department of Urban Administration and Development; fresh representation to be decided within two months; writ petition disposed of without expressing opinion on merits; WPS No. 13276 of 2025; High Court of Chhattisgarh; Justice Part Prateem Sahu; order dated 15/01/2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation on his claim for regularization, with a direction to respondent No.3 and 4 to consider and decide it in accordance with law, on its own merits, expeditiously preferably within two months from receipt of the representation. ¶31

Parmeshwar Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI

¶3

Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.01.15 19:37:00 +0530

¶4

2026:CGHC:2616

¶5

NAFR

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPS No. 13276 of 2025

¶8

Parmeshwar Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Chunnilal Chandrakar Aged About 65 Years R/o Block N, Plot No. 1, Nehru Nagar East, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

State of Chhattisgarh Through Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

Deputy Director (Pension) Directorate, Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through The Commissioner, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG).

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner :Mr. Abhiyuday Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) :Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 & 4 Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate

¶17

SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Part Prateem Sahu

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

15/01/2026

¶20

Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-

¶21

“10.1. It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records of the case.

¶22

10.2. It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing the

¶23

¶24

Respondents to Regularize the petitioner and thus grant him Pension and other retiral dues, along with interest, in a time bound manner.

¶25

10.3. It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to grant him Pension and other retiral dues as having attained the qualification under Rules, 1979, along with interest, in a time bound manner.

¶26

10.4. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court, may deem fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶27

At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking a direction to respondent authorities to take decision on the claim of petitioner with regard to regularization in service. He submits that earlier pursuant to direction issued by this Court, respondent authorities have only considered claim of petitioner for grant of pension and not considered claim of petitioner for regularization.

¶28

Learned counsel for respondent No.3 and 4 would submit that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection. He, however, submits that earlier representation of petitioner was considered and decided, therefore, petitioner may submit fresh representation.

¶29

Heard learned counsel for respective parties.

¶30

¶31

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, submission of learned counsel for parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit fresh representation with regard to his claim for regularization raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition. If such a representation is submitted by petitioner, respondent No.3 and 4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, on its own merits, expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of representation.

¶32

Certified copy as per rules.

¶33

Sd/-

¶34

(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge

¶35

roshan/-

Parmeshwar Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmeshwar Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwat Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mrs. Devika Shori Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manjulata Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shivam Sonwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Madhvesh Chandravanshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Laxmi Prasad Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh