Bhupendra Kumar Shrivash Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

2026:CGHC:17700

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI

¶6

Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI

¶7

WPS No. 13022 of 2025

¶8

Bhupendra Kumar Shrivash S/o Ved Ram Shrivash Aged About 44 Years Posted As Teacher (L.B.) R/o Village Pahara, Post Gondgiri, Block Damdha, District Durg C.G.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

¶12

Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions (D P I) Through Its Director, Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G.

¶13

Collector, District Gariyaband, C.G.

¶14

Joint Director, School Education Division, Raipur C.G.

¶15

District Education Officer, District Gariyabandh, C.G.

¶16

Head Master, Government Middle School, Loharsi, Block Fingeshwar, District Gariyabandh, C.G.

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr. Sibashish Mishra, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer

¶19

SB:Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

¶20

Order On Board

¶21

17/04/2026

¶22

Petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking following

¶23

reliefs:-

¶24

2

¶25

“10.1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 13.10.2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Divisional Level Rationalization Committee Raipur Division, Chhattisgarh.

¶26

10.2.That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P/2) passed by the District Level Rationalization Committee Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh.

¶27

10.3. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 01.06.2025 (Annexure P/3) passed by the District Education Officer, Gariyabandh Chhattisgarh.

¶28

10.4.That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to rectify the subject classification of the Head Master Champoo Lal Ghoghre, by recognizing his actual subject as Hindi on the basis of his graduation mark sheet and service records.

¶29

10.5.That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at his original place of posting i.e. Government Primary School, Loharsi, Block Fingeshwar, District Gariyabandh, with all consequential service.

¶30

10.6.That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other writ/writs, order/orders, or relief/reliefs in favour of the petitioner, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

¶31

3

¶32

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner, who is holding post of Teacher (LB) (Arts) and posted at Government Middle School Naveen Loharsi, Block Fingeshwar, District Gariyabandh, is transferred to Government Middle School Nisthiguda, Block Devbhog, District Gariyabandh under rationalization policy. He contended that petitioner has been erroneously transferred treating him to be a surplus teacher. He submits that Headmaster posted in Government Middle School Naveen Loharsi, Block Fingeshwar is teacher of Hindi language and not ‘Arts’ subject, therefore, petitioner, who is teacher (Arts), cannot be treated as surplus teacher.

¶33

Learned State Counsel opposing submission of learned counsel for petitioner, would submit that under the rationalization policy three tier committee has been constituted to consider grievance of teachers. Petitioner submitted representation before the District Level Committee and the Divisional Level Committee which was rejected vide order dated 13.10.2025 and 24.6.2025 respectively. Thereafter, petitioner has straightaway filed this writ petition in stead of submitting representation/appeal before the State Level Committee under the rationalization policy.

¶34

At this stage learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner may be permitted to submit representation/appeal before the State Level Committee under the rationalization

¶35

4

¶36

policy for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ petition and in turn, said Committee be directed to take decision on the representation/appeal to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time.

¶37

Heard learned counsel for respective parties.

¶38

Taking into consideration facts of case and submission of learned counsel for respective parties, without expressing any opinion on the claim of petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit representation/appeal before the State Level Committee headed by the Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipur (respondent No.2). If such a representation/appeal is submitted by petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the State Level Committee in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation/appeal to be submitted by petitioner.

¶39

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/-

(Parth Prateem Sahu)

Judge

roshan/-

Bhupendra Kumar Shrivash v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhupendra Kumar Shrivash v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taras Ram Madhukar Vs Shri Dwarika Jaiswal

Rashmi Bhaskar Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Dakshina Nagesh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajkumar Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Deepak Kumar Vidani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Soman Lal Netam Vs Mr. Abinash Mishra