Mahendrapal Singhal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on four occasions nor submitted any representation.
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on four occasions nor submitted any representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 1285 of 2016
1 - Mahendrapal Singhal S/o Late Banarasi Das Singhal, Aged About 61 Years Occupation Retired District Judge, R/o House No. 59 Banyan, Housing Board Colony, Boreakala, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Law Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2 - Chhattisgarh High Court, Through Registrar General, Bodri, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3 - A.K. Samant Ray, Presently Principal Secretary Law, Mahanadi Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4 - R. P. Sharma, Presently District Judge, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5 - A. K. Goel, Presently Judge, Family Court, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
6 - P. K. Dave, Presently Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
7 - A. S. Chandel, Presently, Registrar General, Chhattisgarh, High Court, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
| For Petitioner | : None |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Shaswat Mishra, Advcate |
| ForState | Ms.NupurSonker,PL |
2
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board
07/07/2025
The matter is called four times but none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the present petition. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE
Pawan
Mahendrapal Singhal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court