Smt. Pinky Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur, Single Bench of Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal; WPS No. 1195 of 2019, decided 13.01.2026. Petitioner: Smt. Pinky Sinha (Lecturer (L.B.), High School Sunderpur, block Ambikapur, district Surguja). Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development), Zila Panchayat Surguja Ambikapur (CEO), Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Ambikapur, District Education Officer Ambikapur, Janpad Panchayat Surguja Ambikapur (CEO), and Smt. Seema Tiwari. Counsel: Ms. Shashank Thakur for petitioner; Mr. Afroz Khan, Panel Lawyer, for Respondent-State. Disposition: dismissed for want of prosecution — counsel pleaded no instruction; file carries 'NAFR' marking. No substantive adjudication; no statutes or precedents cited; no monetary reliefs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution, as learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instruction at the very outset.