Anand Masih v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; Writ Petition (S) No. 10287 of 2019; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:8285; marked NAFR. Petitioners: Anand Masih, Sangya Chandrakar, Chandrakant Chandrakar, Krishna Kumar Chandrakar, Savita Verma, Rajesh Kumar Naik, Ganesh Prasad Sahu, Ravikant Patel, Pranita Verma, Rakesh Pandey - Head Masters, Government Primary Schools (Raipur, Mahasamund, Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara). Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, Department of School Education) and Director, Directorate of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction. Counsel: G.P. Mathur for petitioners; Amit Buxy, P.L. for Respondents 1 & 2/State. Bench/order by Sanjay K. Agrawal, J., dated 16.02.2026. Dismissed for want of prosecution - counsel had no instructions. No merits decided; no statutory provisions or precedents cited; not citable for any legal proposition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, learned counsel for the petitioners having submitted that he has no instructions on behalf of the petitioners.