Ballu Ram Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition (WPS No. 1022 of 2026, decided 29/01/2026, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Parth Prateem Sahu, J.) by a Field Assistant of Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Matsya Mahasangh seeking consideration of a pending representation for grant of increment/Samayman Vetanman with arrears; petition disposed of without examining merits, with a time-bound direction (three months) to respondent no. 2 to decide the representation in accordance with law; State (Fishiculture Department) had no objection to the limited prayer; no statute or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent no. 2 to consider and take decision on the petitioner's pending representation for grant of increment/Samayman Vetanman in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of the order passed by this Court.