Dismissed¶38

Subhas Verma v. Jawahar

Chhattisgarh HC16 Jul 2026WPL/91/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPL No. 91 of 2025; Subhas Verma (82-year-old petitioner, Bilaspur) v. Jawahar and 21 other respondents (Dewari, Tehsil Mungeli); order dated 17.07.2026 by Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; petition dismissed at the threshold because counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instruction; petitioner granted liberty to revive the prayer if cause of action still survives; no statutes cited, no precedents engaged, no impugned order identified; NAFR (non-reportable).

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to revive his prayer if cause of action still survives. ¶38

Subhas Verma Vs Jawahar — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.07.17 18:37:50 +0530

CGHC010153812025

2026:CGHC:30514

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPL No. 91 of 2025

¶8

1 - Subhas Verma S/o Late Gyan Chand Verma Aged About 82 Years R/o Rupchand Bada, Gond Para, Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Jawahar S/o Kanhaiya Yadav Aged About 52 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶12

2 - Pokhraj S/o Jawahar Aged About 30 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶13

3 - Devpuri S/o Bhulaun Baba Aged About 44 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶14

4 - Leela Ram S/o Kanhaiya Yadav Aged About 44 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶15

5 - Peela Ram S/o Kanhaiya Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶16

6 - Punni S/o Raju Kewat Aged About 54 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶17

7 - Munna S/o Kapil Satnami Aged About 45 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶18

8 - Vicky S/o Bharat Satnami Aged About 29 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶19

9 - Sheetal S/o Prasadi Aged About 40 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶20

10 - Kalu Alias Sandesh S/o Ghasi Ram Yadav Aged About 42 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. - Mungeli)

¶21

11 - Santu Alias Santa S/o Mahtaru Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶22

¶23

12 - Sukhdev S/o Bulao Baba Aged About 39 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶24

13 - Raghu S/o Jutheel Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶25

14 - Nanu S/o Bhoolau Baba Aged About 37 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli) 15 - Raju S/o Jagdish Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli) 16 - Rakesh S/o Nandu Yadav Aged About 31 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶26

17 - Kalaram S/o Kanhaiya Yadav Aged About 38 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶27

18 - Jagdev S/o Bhoolau Baba Aged About 33 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶28

19 - Ghosu S/o Dukhi Yadav Aged About 36 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶29

20 - Sonu S/o Nandu Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶30

21 - Samaru S/o Thanu Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶31

22 - Lala S/o Govinda Baret Aged About 33 Years R/o Dewari, Post - Karahi, Tehsil - Mungeli, District - Bilaspur (C.G.), (Current Distt. -Mungeli)

¶32

... Respondent(s)

¶33

For Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Advocate For Respondents : None.

¶34

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶35

Order on Board

¶36

17.07.2026

¶37

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction in the matter.

¶38

Taking into consideration the submission advanced by Mr. Giri, this petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer

¶39

¶40

if cause of action still survives.

¶41

Sd/-

¶42

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)

¶43

JUDGE

¶44

$iddhant

Subhas Verma v. Jawahar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhas Verma v. Jawahar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivani Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ajeet Singh Kshatriya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ram Krishna Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ku. Rukmani Kaiwart Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shivendra Bahadur Kamthe Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chitralekha Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh