Dismissed¶¶22

Jaiprakash Shrivastava v. Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc)

Chhattisgarh HC29 Jun 2026WPL/43/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to challenge subsequent final order; dismissal as withdrawn; Industrial Court Bilaspur order dated 10.02.2026; final order dated 16.06.2026; locus standi objection reserved for Respondent No. 1; maintainability of appeal; trade union Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (INTUC); Registrar Trade Union Chhattisgarh; Jaiprakash Shrivastava; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; 30.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted with liberty to challenge the final order dated 16.06.2026 passed during its pendency; I.A. No. 3/2026 disposed of. ¶¶22

Jaiprakash Shrivastava Vs Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc) — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:26507

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPL No. 43 of 2026

¶6

Jaiprakash Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Harihar Lal Shrivastava Aged About 59 Years R/o B/4, New Rajnagar Colony, Post Rajgar Colliery Anuppur (M.P.) ... Petitioner

¶7

Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.06.30 14:56:54 +0530

¶8

versus

¶9

Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc) Through General Secretary, P.K. Rai, S/o Late Shri Rajmangal Rai Aged About 72 Years R/o North Jhagrakhand, Ward No. 15, District- Manendragarh- Chirmiri, Baikunthpur (C.G.)

¶10

Registrar, Trade Union Chhattisgarh Block- 3, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

Shri S.S. Paikara, Registrar, Trade Union , Chhattisgarh Block- 3 Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

... Respondent(s)

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.	Dinesh Bole, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1 : Mr.	S.P. Kale, Advocate
For State/Respondent No. 2 : Mr.	Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

30.06.2026

¶17

Heard on I.A. No. 3/2026, an application for permission for withdrawal of petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent final order.

¶18

Mr. S. P. Kale, Advocate appearing for respondent No. 2 would oppose such prayer. He would submit that final order has already been passed, and therefore, no such liberty can be granted. It is also contended that petitioner was not party before the learned Court below.

¶19

Mr. Vinay Pandey would endorse the submission made by Mr. Kale.

¶20

¶21

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶22

This writ petition was filed by the petitioner assailing order dated 10.02.2026 passed by Industrial Court, Bilaspur. During the pendency of this petition, final order has been passed on 16.06.2026, and therefore, an application has been moved for withdrawal of writ petition. The prayer made by the petitioner appears to be fair, accordingly, allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶23

With regard to liberty, as final order has already been passed during the pendency of this petition, the liberty is granted as payed for. However, the respondent No. 1 shall be at liberty to take objection before the appropriate forum with regard to locus of the petitioner and maintainability of appeal etc.

¶24

Accordingly, I.A. No. 3/2026 is disposed of.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE

¶27

$iddhant

Jaiprakash Shrivastava v. Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaiprakash Shrivastava v. Rashtriya Koyla Kamgar Sangh (Intuc)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Kumar Tiwari Vs Secretary and General Manager

Sumani Kashyap Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dinesh Tati Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Union of India Vs General Secretary

Smt. Jyoti Babli Kujur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shree Ramdoot Ispat Private Limited, Vs Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Officer