Dismissed¶24

State Of Chhattisgarh v. Bisahu Netam

Chhattisgarh HC6 Apr 2026WPL/186/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPL No. 186 of 2015; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; order dated 7.04.2026; State of Chhattisgarh and Executive Engineer, PWD Bemetara v. Bisahu Netam; Industrial Disputes Act reference (Case No.34/I.D.Act/2009); Labour Court Durg award dated 9.2.2015; termination of services set aside; reinstatement without back wages; regularization of services vide order dated 16.6.2021; award already complied with; no ground to interfere; writ petition dismissed; no costs.

What did the court decide?

No relief to the petitioners; the challenge to the Labour Court award dated 9.2.2015 was rejected, with no order as to costs. ¶24

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Bisahu Netam — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:15902

NAFR

NIRMALA RAO

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPL No. 186 of 2015

¶7

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh The Petitioner No. 1 Was Not A Party Before The Learned Labour Court But Has Been Impleaded As Petitioner No. 1 In The Instant Petition As The Proper Course Is To Implead The State Government Through The Secretary Of The Concerned Department., Chhattisgarh

¶8

2 - The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Bemetara, Durg Chhattisgarh Now District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Bisahu Netam S/o Kartik Ram Netam, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Sodh, Tahsil And P. S. Berla District Durg Chhattisgarh Now District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶12

2 - The Judge, Under I. D. Act, Labour Court, Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶13

... Respondent(s)

¶14

(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)

¶15

For Petitioner/s/ State : Shri Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, G.A. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate.

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Order on Board

0 7.04.2026

The petitioners/ State have challenged the award passed by the learned Labour Court, Durg (C.G.) in Case No.34/I.D.Act/2009/ Reference dated 9.2.2015, whereby the order of termination of services was set aside and respondent No.1 was reinstated in service without payment of back wages.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 would fairly submit that the services of respondent No.1 have been regularized vide order dated 16.6.2021 and he has placed that order alongwith the reply. He would contend that the award passed by the learned Labour Court has already been complied with.

¶22

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/ State would oppose.

¶23

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the records.

¶24

Taking into consideration the fact that pursuant to the award passed by the learned Labour Court dated 9.2.2015, the services of respondent No.1 have been regularized vide order dated 16.6.2021, therefore, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the findings recorded by the learned Labour Court. Consequently, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost(s).

¶25

Sd/(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶26

Nimmi

State Of Chhattisgarh v. Bisahu Netam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Of Chhattisgarh v. Bisahu Netam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Laxmi Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kanti Karsh Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Corporation Limited

Naveen Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S. Budhia Auto Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Kumar Tandan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Prasad Dubey Vs State of Chhattisgarh