Dismissed¶¶32

Chintu Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC8 Apr 2026WPCR/189/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPCR No. 189 of 2026; police protection writ petition; protection from family members; marriage statement recording; non-joinder of necessary party; father of petitioner No.2 not arrayed; petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh; return of certified copies subject to fine; Katghora, Korba; Ramesh Sinha, C.J.; Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.; decided 09.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh impleading the father of petitioner No.2 as party; certified copies of annexed documents, if any, to be returned to petitioner's counsel after obtaining photocopies, subject to deposit of the fine amount. ¶¶32

Chintu Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:16284-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPCR No. 189 of 2026

¶6

MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREETKAUR Date: 2026.04.10 11:02:55 +0530

¶7

1 - Chintu Agrawal S/o Shri Giriraj Agrawal Aged About 38 Years R/o Bazar Mohalla, Katghora, P.S. Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Anjali Sharma D/o Shri Naveen Sharma Aged About 28 Years R/o Bazar Mohalla, Katghora, P.S. Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

2 - The Secretary Department Of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

3 - The Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

4 - The Superintendent Of Police Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh

¶14

5 - The Station House Officer Police Station- Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh

¶15

... Respondent(s)

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board

¶18

¶19

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶20

09.04.2026

¶21

1. Heard Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate for respondents / State.

¶22

2. The petitioners have filed this petition praying for following relief:-

¶23

“i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass appropriate writ/order/direction in favour of the petitioners protecting their fundamental and human rights enshrined under the Constitution of India;

¶24

ii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant police protection to the petitioners from their family members and issue a direction to family members from the competent authority to not fear or threaten the petitioners in any manner;

¶25

iii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to record the statement of the petitioners fortifying their marriage Court/Authority; before the competent

¶26

iv. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”

¶27

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instance of the father of petitioner No.2, the Police is harassing the petitioners.

¶28

4. It has been pointed out by learned State counsel that the father of petitioner No.2 has not been arrayed as a party in the present petition.

¶29

5. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, impleading

¶30

¶31

the father of petitioner No.2 as a party.

¶32

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn , with liberty to file afresh, impleading the father of petitioner No.2 as party in the present petition.

¶33

7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount.

¶34

Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha ) Judge Chief Justice

¶35

Manpreet

Chintu Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chintu Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Chanda Kashyap Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Kalindar Ram

Shashi Bhushan (S.B. Pandey) Advocate, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Govt. of India Vs Debakishor Padhan

Bharat Lal Kaiwart Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Surendra Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh