Dismissed¶28

Bharat Bhushan Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Mar 2026WPC/953/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short single-judge disposal order: writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh better constituted petition; counsel for petitioners sought withdrawal after arguing for some time, respondents' counsel raised no objection. Petitioners: six members of the Verma family of Durg acting through power-of-attorney holder Taran Lal Verma. Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Revenue and Disaster Management), Collector Durg, SDO(R) Durg, Sub Registrar Durg. Bench: Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi. Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. Decision date: 16/03/2026. Neutral citation 2026:CGHC:12509; NAFR. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no issues framed, no monetary quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh better constituted petition. ¶28

Bharat Bhushan Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:12509

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 953 of 2026

¶6

1 - Bharat Bhushan Verma S/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 65 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶7

2 - Yogendra Bhushan S/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 60 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶8

3 - Meena Bai W/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 63 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶9

4 - Hemprabha D/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 57 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶10

5 - Shailkumari D/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 57 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶11

6 - Chandrakala D/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 57 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma

¶12

¶13

Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶14

... Petitioners

¶15

versus

¶16

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶17

2 - The Collector Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶18

3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶19

4 - The Sub Registrar Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

{Cause title, as taken from Case Information System}

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr. Avinash Chandra Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer.

¶23

(Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶24

Order on Board

¶25

16/03/2026

¶26

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition.

¶27

Counsel for the respondents has no objection to allow the limited prayer made by petitioner’s counsel.

¶28

On due consideration, the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as aforesaid.

¶29

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶32

Judge

¶33

AMITKUMARDUBEY Digitally signedby AMITKUMAR DUBEYDate:2026.03.1711:08:28 +0530

¶34

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Bharat Bhushan Verma S/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 65 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)¶6
Avinash Chandra Sahu
petitioner
Yogendra Bhushan S/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 60 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)¶7
Avinash Chandra Sahu
petitioner
Meena Bai W/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 63 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)¶8
Avinash Chandra Sahu
petitioner
Hemprabha D/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 57 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)¶9
Avinash Chandra Sahu
petitioner
Shailkumari D/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 57 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma S/o Bharat Bhusan Verma Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)¶10
Avinash Chandra Sahu
petitioner
Chandrakala D/o Raghunandan Verma Aged About 57 Years Being Represented By Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Taran Lal Verma, R/o Ward No. 20, Near Chandulal Chandrakar Medical College Kachandur, Karanja Bhilai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)¶11
Avinash Chandra Sahu
respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh¶16
Arham Siddiqui
respondent
The Collector Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh¶17
Arham Siddiqui
respondent
The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh¶18
Arham Siddiqui
respondent
The Sub Registrar Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh¶19
Arham Siddiqui

Coram

AI extract

Naresh Kumar Chandravanshiauthor¶23

Bharat Bhushan Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharat Bhushan Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chanda Shrivas Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manoj Bharti Vs Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank

Balwan Singh Vs Jitendra Singh Rajput

Satish Shukla Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Alpha Wahne Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Khushram Manjhi Vs State of Chhattisgarh