Smt. Kanchan Gaikwad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

2026:CGHC:10963

¶3

Digitally signed by RUKHSAR RUKHSAR BANO BANO Date: 2026.03.03 17:29:19 +0530

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 930 of 2026

¶7

1 - Smt. Kanchan Gaikwad W/o Shri Tokendra Gaikwad Aged About 37 Years Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mura, Janpad Panchayat Tilda, District Raipur R/o Village Mura, Post Office Bangoli, Police Station And Tehsil Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Collector Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

3 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Tilda-Nevra, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

6 - Smt. Kanti Verma W/o Shri Sanjay Verma, Ex-Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mura, Janpad Panchayat Tilda, District Raipur R/o Village Mura, Post Office Bangoli, Police Station And Tehsil Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS system)

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate For State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Govt. Adv.

¶16

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

03/03/2026

¶19

Heard.

¶20

This petition has been preferred by petitioner under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:-

¶21

2

¶22

“10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to place all the records of the case for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

¶23

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing Respondents No. 2 to 5 to execute the recovery of 46,06,100/-consequent₹ to the Final Notice dated 18/06/2025 and the Petitioner's representations dated 15/04/2025 and 22/07/2025.

¶24

10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct a high-level inquiry into the financial mismanagement of the Minor Mineral funds in Gram Panchayat Mura.

¶25

10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a direction to the Respondent Authorities to immediate grant 46,06,100/- to Gram Panchayat Mura for the₹ construction of roads, library, and health center facilities.

¶26

10.5 That, such other reliefs as the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice.”

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is presently posted as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Mura, Janpad Panchayat Tilda, District Raipur (CG). He further submits that the former Sarpanch, Smt. Kanti Verma (respondent No.6), withdrew a huge amount of funds but did not initiate any work, thereby misusing the Panchayat funds. He next submits that upon a complaint made by the petitioner, three notices have been issued to respondent No.6 by the CEO, Janpad Panchayat, Tilda-Neora; however, no concrete action has been initiated against her. He further submits that the petitioner also filed an application dated 22.07.2025 (Annexure -P/7) before respondent No.2, the Collector, Raipur, but no action has been taken

¶28

3

¶29

against respondent No.6. Hence, learned counsel prays that, at this stage, the present writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take an appropriate decision on the aforesaid application submitted by the petitioner within a stipulated period.

¶30

Learned counsel for the State submits that an appropriate decision on the application filed by the petitioner shall be taken by the concerned authority in accordance with law.

¶31

Having considered the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing respondent No.2, the Collector, Raipur, to take an appropriate decision on the application dated 22.07.2025 (Annexure -P/7) submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, or to direct the concerned competent authority to do so expeditiously, preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/submission of a copy of this order, if no decision has already been taken.

¶32

With the aforesaid observations and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of .

¶33

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶36

Rukhsar

Smt. Kanchan Gaikwad v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kanchan Gaikwad v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balajee Real Infra. Private Limited Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manjhiram Sahare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ajay Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt Jhina Beck Vs Sunil Haribhau Pote

Jai Mahalaxmi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rita Minj Vs State of Chhattisgarh