Disposed¶31

Ramadhin Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Feb 2026WPC/702/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPC No. 702 of 2026; Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.; Ramadhin Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh; demarcation of ancestral agricultural land; Tahsildar Khairagarh; Khasra Nos. 40/25 to 149/4, 0.957 hectares, Village Banbod; pending application Annexure P-2 dated 04.03.2025 with fee paid; partial demarcation 25.06.2025 incomplete due to rains; 45-day compliance direction; Article 226 Constitution of India; land records/revenue matter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No. 4 - Tahsildar, Khairagarh to decide the demarcation application (Annexure P-2 dated 04.03.2025) and carry out demarcation within 45 days of receipt/submission of a copy of the order; petitioner to approach the Tahsildar's office for unhindered compliance. ¶31

Ramadhin Gond Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

2026:CGHC:8365

NAFR

Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.02.18 10:32:08 +0530

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 702 of 2026

¶7

Ramadhin Gond S/o Late Pancham Gond Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Banbod, Tahsil Khairagarh, Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner.

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

Collector Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, C.G., Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

Sub Divisional Officer (R) Khairagarh, Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, C.G.,

¶13

Tahsildar Khiaragarh Distt. Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

... Respondents.

¶15

(cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate. For Res/State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

¶17

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

¶18

Order On Board

¶19

17-02-2026

¶20

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :-

¶21

¶22

" 10.1 That the Hon'ble Court kindly be pleased to issue an order, directing the respondent No. 4 to take prompt action for demarcation of lands of the petitioner within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶23

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner matter.

¶24

10.3 Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner”

¶25

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is recorded owner of the land bearing Khasra Nos.40/25, 40/27, 40/43, 40/45, 115/2, 128/4, 133/10, 137/4, 141/9, 149/4 total area 0.957 hectares situated at Village Banbod, Patwari Halka No.15, Rajswa Nigam Mandal Mudhipar, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Khairagrh-ChhuikhadanGandai (KCG), Chhattisgarh. It is submitted that the aforesaid land is ancestral property of the petitioner, but presently he is in possession of about only half acre of property and he is facing many problems in absence of demarcation of subject land. Therefore, he has filed an application (Annexure P-2) dated 04.03.2025 for demarcation of the subject land. The petitioner has also paid requisite fee for the said demarcation, despite that demarcation has not been carried out, therefore, he submits that respondent No. 4- Tahsildar, Khairagarh may be directed to get the above land of the petitioner demarcated.

¶26

In reply, learned counsel for the State/respondents, on instructions, submits that demarcation of some portion of the land of the petitioner was carried out on 25.06.2025, but because of rainy season, demarcation work was not

¶27

¶28

completed. Learned counsel for the State submits that if petitioner shall extend his consent, then fresh demarcation of the aforesaid land be carried

¶29

out.

¶30

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶31

Having considered aforesaid contention putforth by counsel for both the parties, this petition stands disposed of directing respondent No. 4 - Tahsildar, Khairagarh, District Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai to take decision on the application (Annexure P-2) dated 04.03.2025 filed by the petitioner and demarcation be carried out within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt/submission of copy this order. The petitioner is further directed to approach before the office of Tahsildar, Khairagarh for unhindered compliance of this order.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶34

Ajay

Ramadhin Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramadhin Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alijaved Kujur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gurdeep Singh Sahgal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tareshwar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajnandgaon Chinmay Multispeciality Hospital Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramgulal Gond Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pratap Gond Vs State of Chhattisgarh