Dismissed

Adarsh Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Sept 2026WPC/4701/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a writ petition filed to quash an advertisement and seek a direction for hot meal supply. The court held the petition was premature as the petitioner was still supplying meals and no adverse order existed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition to quash the advertisement and direct supply orders was dismissed; the petitioner is at liberty to approach the court if exigency arises.

Adarsh Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

CGHC010354022026 2026:CGHC:40371

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 4701 of 2026

¶6

Adarsh Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh P.V.- 17 (Ravindranagar), Through The Secretary- Reena Roy Wife Of Shri Devashish Roy, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of P.V.- 116, Ward No. 15 Ambedkar Ward, Pakhanjur, DistrictNorth Bastar (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Though The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.).

¶10

2. The District Programme Officer Women And Child Development, DistrictNorth Bastar Kanker (C.G.).

¶11

3. The Project Officer Women	And Child Development Project, Pakhanjur,
District- North Bastar Kanker	(C.G.).
	... Respondents
For Petitioner	: Mr. Krishnakant Prajapati, Advocate.
For State/Respondents	: Ms. Akansha Verma, P.L.

¶12

Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

16/09/2026

1. Heard.

2. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:-

¶17

“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be

¶18

pleased to call the record of case from the respondent authorities.

¶19

Digitally DEEPTIJHA signedbyDEEPTI JHA

¶20

10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby quashing/setting aside the impugned

¶21

¶22

advertisement dated 31.08.2026 (Annexure-P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to supply hot meal for the allotted Anganbadi Centres of Sectors namely Gondahur, Bande, Korenar and Panawar.

¶23

10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given. ”

¶24

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the supplier of the hot meal to the Anganbadi Centres of Sectors namely Gondahur, Bande, Korenar and Panawar. He further submits that there is no adverse order has been passed against the petitioner, but he is aggrieved with the advertisement dated 31.08.2026 (Annexure-P/1) stating that perhaps the respondent authorities would cancel his supply order. Hence, this writ petition has been filed.

¶25

4. Learned State counsel submits that instant writ petition is premature. She further submits that petitioner is still supplying the hot meal to the Anganbadi Centres of Sectors namely Gondahur, Bande, Korenar and Panawar and petitioner may also participate in the said advertisement and there is no any embargo in participating the advertisement for supplying of hot meal. She also submits that till date no adverse order has been passed against the petitioner, neither the supply of the hot meal supplied by him has been stopped, therefore, no order can be passed, for which, the petitioner is claiming by way of this writ petition. The advertisement was issued on 31.08.2026, which cannot be cancelled only on the basis of petitioner’s presumptions. Hence, the instant writ petition deserves to be dismissed.

¶26

5. From perusal of the material available on record and also when the said fact enquired about the petitioner’s counsel that whether petitioner is still supplying the hot meal regularly to the concerned Anganbadi Centres or not, then he submits that petitioner is still supplying the hot meal regularly to the

¶27

¶28

concerned Anganbadi Centres and there is no adverse order has been passed against him.

¶29

6. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, it appears that there is no good or valid grounds available to quash the advertisement dated 31.08.2026 (Annexure-P/1) and also considering the fact that petitioner is still supplying the hot meal to the concerned Anganbadi Centres and there is no adverse order has been passed against the petitioner, hence the instant writ petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to approach before this Court, if any, exigency arises.

¶30

7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

¶31

8. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶34

Deepti Jha

Adarsh Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adarsh Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases