Dismissed¶24

Sylvester Toppo v. Idbi Bank Ltd.

Chhattisgarh HC12 May 2026WPC/3691/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous writ petition dismissed; grievance redressed during pendency; no surviving cause of action; no substantive issue survives; IDBI Bank Ltd.; Reserve Bank of India; Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPC No. 3691 of 2022; Sylvester Toppo; Amitendra Kishore Prasad; 13.05.2026; no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner's grievance already stands redressed and no substantive issue survives for adjudication, continuation of the proceedings would serve no useful purpose; accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶24

Sylvester Toppo Vs Idbi Bank Ltd. — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

YOGESH TIWARI

¶3

Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.14 10:18:02 +0530

¶4

2026:CGHC:22693

¶5

NAFR

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPC No. 3691 of 2022

¶8

Sylvester Toppo S/o Benedict Toppo Aged About 68 Years A/a 68 Years, R/o Mig-540, Padnabhpur Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - IDBI Bank Ltd. Through Its Managing Director And CEO Cuff Parade, Colaba, Mumbai (Maharashtra) Pin 400005

¶12

2 - General Manager (Vigilance) IDBI Bank Bhubaneswar, IDBI House, Zanpath, Ground Floor, Unit-9, Bhubaneswar (Odisha) Pin 751022

¶13

3 - Branch Manager IDBI Bank Ltd. Branch Office Kawardha, R.K. Plaza, Raipur Road, Main Road Kawardha, District KawardhaKabirdham (C.G.)

¶14

4 - Assistant Manager Reserve Bank Of India, Central Office First Floor Amar Building, Sir.P.M. Road, Fort Mumbai (Maharashtra) Pin 400001

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Advocate

¶17

Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

13.05.2026

¶20

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner has already been redressed by the concerned

¶21

¶22

authorities and, therefore, no surviving cause of action now remains for adjudication by this Court. It is further submitted that in view of the subsequent developments and the relief having already been extended to the petitioner, the present writ petition has become infructuous.

¶23

2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that since the grievance of the petitioner already stands redressed and no substantive issue survives for adjudication, continuation of the present proceedings would serve no useful purpose.

¶24

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶27

Yogesh

Sylvester Toppo v. Idbi Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sylvester Toppo v. Idbi Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narsingh Reddy Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramkumar Paikra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sesh Narayan Dubey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Meena Vs Reserve Bank of India

Vikash Kumar Raj Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajkumar Vs Girwar Lal