Prafful Kumar Nayak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

CGHC010256262026

2026:CGHC:27944

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 3505 of 2026

¶7

1 - Prafful Kumar Nayak S/o Shri Bhimrao Nayak, Aged About 33 Years R/o Teachers Colony, Azad Nagar, Ward No. 4, Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶8

Digitally signed 2 - Shivsharan Singh Thakur, S/o Shri Dilharan Singh Thakur, Aged About 41 by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU Years R/o Pattharkhan, Tahsil Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

3 - Fahim Khan, S/o Late Shri Abdul Haleem Khan, Aged About 38 Years R/o Idgah Chowk, Mission Hospital Road In Front Of Akbar Chawl, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

... Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

2 - Commissioner Bilaspur Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶14

3 - Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶15

4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bodri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶16

5 - Tehsildar, Bodri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶17

2

¶18

6 - Dilip Kosale, S/o Shri Kanhaiya Kosale, Aged About 34 Years R/o Pendridih, Tahsil Bodri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶19

...Respondents (Cause title is downloaded From CIS Periphery) For Petitioners : Mr. Yashraj Verma, Advocate. For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, P.L.

¶20

(Cause title is downloaded From CIS Periphery)

¶21

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board

¶22

07/07/2026

¶23

The petitioner has filed the instant petition for following reliefs:-

¶24

“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the proceedings drawn by respondent No. 5 on the application for mutation preferred by the petitioners which is pending adjudication, for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court.

¶25

10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing respondent No. 5 (Tehsildar, Bodri, District Bilaspur (C.G.)) to decide the pending application for mutation dated 20.06.2025 preferred by the petitioners in light of the order dated 16.01.2025 passed by the learned Commisioner, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶26

10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing initiation of departmental proceedings against the respondent No. 5 for not taking any decision for more than a year on the pending application for mutation preferred by the petitioners despite there being an order from the superior revenue court.

¶27

10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, which it deems fit and proper.”

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had filed an online application on 20.06.2025 before the Tehsildar, Bodri, District Bilaspur (C.G.), seeking mutation of their names in the revenue records. It is submitted that despite the lapse of

¶29

3

¶30

considerable time, the said application is still pending consideration and has not been decided till date. Being aggrieved by such inaction on the part of the concerned authority, the petitioners have been restrained to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court seeking a direction to respondent No. 5/Tehsildar to consider and decide the aforesaid mutation application in accordance with law. Learned counsel further submits that the concerned Commissioner, by order dated 16.01.2025, has already recorded that the parties have settled their dispute, and therefore, no impediment survives for deciding the petitioners' application for mutation.

¶31

Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that he has no objection to issuance of an appropriate direction to the concerned Tehsildar for expeditious consideration and disposal of the online application preferred by the petitioners on 20.06.2025.

¶32

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶33

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioners had already submitted an online application for mutation on 20.06.2025 and that the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.), vide order dated 16.01.2025, has recorded that the parties have settled their dispute, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the concerned Tehsildar to consider and decide the said application

¶34

4

¶35

dated 20.06.2025 expeditiously, preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioners, and the aforesaid direction is being issued solely in view of the order dated 16.01.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.), and the pending online application dated 20.06.2025 (Annexure P-1). The petitioners shall approach the concerned Tehsildar within a period of one week from the date of this order along with a copy of the same and shall pursue the remedy available to them before the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶36

With this observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of.

¶37

Sd/(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)

¶38

Judge

¶39

U.K. Raju

Prafful Kumar Nayak v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prafful Kumar Nayak v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Kumar Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lal Bahadur Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Varsha Sahu

Mrs. Basanta Khare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sahab Rahi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Fulsundari Vs State of Chhattisgarh